Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Applied Psychology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 40
- Child Abuse and Trauma 37
- Health 40
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 33
- Top scholars
- Florian RehbeinThomas MößleDirk BaierSören KliemWerner GreveElmar BrählerMichael HanslmaierMichael Windzio
- Journals
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence (12 papers)European Journal of Criminology (11 papers)Kindheit und Entwicklung (7 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (6 papers)Addiction (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony
298 papers receiving 6.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
- Clinical Psychology 2.5k
- Applied Psychology 483
- Sociology and Political Science 3.8k
- Health 593
- Education 1.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony at the time of their publication.
About Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony have published 363 papers, which have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 144 papers in Clinical Psychology, 40 papers in Health, 220 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 60 papers in Social Psychology and 13 papers in Applied Psychology on the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (54 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (42 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (40 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (37 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (33 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (30 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (29 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (28 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (2.5k citations), Applied Psychology (483 citations), Sociology and Political Science (3.8k citations), Health (593 citations) and Education (1.4k citations). Authors at Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony collaborate with scholars in Germany, Switzerland and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Interpersonal Violence, European Journal of Criminology, Kindheit und Entwicklung, Frontiers in Psychology and Addiction. Some of Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony's most productive authors include Florian Rehbein, Thomas Mößle, Dirk Baier, Sören Kliem, Werner Greve, Elmar Brähler, Michael Hanslmaier, Michael Windzio, Matthias Kleimann and Charles P. O’Brien.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.