National Institute for Parasitic Diseases
Impact in
- Parasitology top 0.5%
- Parasites and Host Interactions
- Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
- Vector-borne infectious diseases
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Parasitic infections in humans and animals
Papers in
- Parasitology 981
- Parasites and Host Interactions 792
- Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics 121
- Vector-borne infectious diseases 69
-
- Parasitic infections in humans and animals 263
- Top scholars
- Xiao‐Nong ZhouJürg UtzingerShu-Hua XiaoMarcel TannerPeter SteinmannDonald Peter McManusJianping CaoRobert N. Bergquist
- Journals
- Infectious Diseases of Poverty (197 papers)Parasites & Vectors (134 papers)Acta Tropica (109 papers)PLoS neglected tropical diseases (98 papers)China CDC Weekly (65 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
National Institute for Parasitic Diseases
1.9k papers receiving 44.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
- Parasitology 22.1k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 4.3k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 8.1k
- Small Animals 1.8k
- Insect Science 2k
Countries citing scholars working at National Institute for Parasitic Diseases
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute for Parasitic Diseases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute for Parasitic Diseases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute for Parasitic Diseases more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute for Parasitic Diseases
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute for Parasitic Diseases at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute for Parasitic Diseases at the time of their publication.
About National Institute for Parasitic Diseases
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute for Parasitic Diseases have published 2k papers, which have received a total of 44.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 981 papers in Parasitology, 263 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 484 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 104 papers in Insect Science and 54 papers in Small Animals on the topics of Parasites and Host Interactions (792 papers), Malaria Research and Control (329 papers), Parasitic infections in humans and animals (263 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (121 papers), Mollusks and Parasites Studies (94 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (69 papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (57 papers) and Helminth infection and control (49 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Parasitology (22.1k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (4.3k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (8.1k citations), Small Animals (1.8k citations) and Insect Science (2k citations). Authors at National Institute for Parasitic Diseases collaborate with scholars in China, Switzerland and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Infectious Diseases of Poverty, Parasites & Vectors, Acta Tropica, PLoS neglected tropical diseases and China CDC Weekly. Some of National Institute for Parasitic Diseases's most productive authors include Xiao‐Nong Zhou, Jürg Utzinger, Shu-Hua Xiao, Marcel Tanner, Peter Steinmann, Donald Peter McManus, Jianping Cao, Robert N. Bergquist, Shan Lv and Men‐Bao Qian.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.