National Institute for Health and Care Research
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 2%
Papers in
- Ophthalmology 438
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 164
- Top scholars
- Christopher D. ByrneGiovanni TargherDesmond G. HigginsJaap HeringaCédric NotredameDileep N. LoboMichael V. HolmesAvan Aihie Sayer
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (275 papers)BMJ Open (270 papers)Scientific Reports (121 papers)The Lancet (99 papers)Frontiers in Immunology (95 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
National Institute for Health and Care Research
10.1k papers receiving 447.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
- Biological Psychiatry 6.3k
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 4.9k
- Epidemiology 60.8k
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 28.8k
- Physiology 43.9k
Countries citing scholars working at National Institute for Health and Care Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute for Health and Care Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute for Health and Care Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute for Health and Care Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute for Health and Care Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute for Health and Care Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute for Health and Care Research at the time of their publication.
About National Institute for Health and Care Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute for Health and Care Research have published 12.8k papers, which have received a total of 576.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 123 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 438 papers in Ophthalmology, 294 papers in Hepatology, 1.2k papers in Epidemiology and 673 papers in Infectious Diseases on the topics of Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (311 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (192 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (166 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (165 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (164 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (159 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (151 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (151 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (6.3k citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (4.9k citations), Epidemiology (60.8k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (28.8k citations) and Physiology (43.9k citations). Authors at National Institute for Health and Care Research collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Scientific Reports, The Lancet and Frontiers in Immunology. Some of National Institute for Health and Care Research's most productive authors include Christopher D. Byrne, Giovanni Targher, Desmond G. Higgins, Jaap Heringa, Cédric Notredame, Dileep N. Lobo, Michael V. Holmes, Avan Aihie Sayer, Frank O. Nestlé and George Davey Smith.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.