National Institute of Food and Agriculture

5.4k citations
266 papers ·

Impact in

    • Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
    • Food Safety and Hygiene
    • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance

Papers in

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

231 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
  • Food Science 814
  • Plant Science 1.5k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 390
  • Horticulture 32
  • Insect Science 360
Replace Novozymes (United States) with:
Novozymes (United States) United States
National Wildlife Federation United States
Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffolk County United States
Mount Vernon Nazarene University United States
Diversitech (United States) United States
The Center For Rural Development United States
International Life Sciences Institute United States
Campbell Soup (United States) United States
Ian's Friends Foundation United States
Catholic Relief Services United States
National Institute of Food and Agriculture relative to Novozymes (United States) United States Novozymes (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Novozymes (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Food and Agriculture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Food and Agriculture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Food and Agriculture more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Food and Agriculture at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Food and Agriculture at the time of their publication.

About National Institute of Food and Agriculture

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Food and Agriculture have published 266 papers, which have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5 papers in Horticulture, 26 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 76 papers in Plant Science, 8 papers in Forestry and 34 papers in Food Science on the topics of Organic Food and Agriculture (12 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (10 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (10 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (10 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (9 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (8 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Food Science (814 citations), Plant Science (1.5k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (390 citations), Horticulture (32 citations) and Insect Science (360 citations). Authors at National Institute of Food and Agriculture collaborate with scholars in United States, Pakistan and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Food Protection, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Dairy Science and Agronomy. Some of National Institute of Food and Agriculture's most productive authors include Hongda Chen, Rickey Y. Yada, Norman R. Scott, Isabel Walls, Hong-Da Chen, Avigad Vonshak, P. J. M. Cooper, David A. Fischhoff, David B. Lobell and David Molden.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact