National Institute of Disaster Management
Impact in
-
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
-
- Flood Risk Assessment and Management
- Climate variability and models
Papers in
-
- Landslides and related hazards 35
-
- Flood Risk Assessment and Management 45
- Hydrology and Drought Analysis 12
- Top scholars
- Chandrika RaoM. SantoshAnil K. GuptaPiyoosh RautelaSurya ParkashHarjeet KaurRobert BolinSrimanta Gupta
- Journals
- Disaster Prevention and Management An International Journal (13 papers)Natural Hazards (7 papers)International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (7 papers)Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (7 papers)Journal of Asian Earth Sciences (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
National Institute of Disaster Management
197 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Geophysics 772
- Global and Planetary Change 766
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 332
- Emergency Medical Services 121
- Atmospheric Science 336
Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Disaster Management
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Disaster Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Disaster Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Disaster Management more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Disaster Management
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Disaster Management at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Disaster Management at the time of their publication.
About National Institute of Disaster Management
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Disaster Management have published 257 papers, which have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 39 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 60 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 34 papers in Geophysics, 13 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 1 paper in Chemical Health and Safety on the topics of Flood Risk Assessment and Management (45 papers), Landslides and related hazards (35 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (27 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (22 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (18 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (16 papers), Disaster Response and Management (13 papers) and Hydrology and Drought Analysis (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geophysics (772 citations), Global and Planetary Change (766 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (332 citations), Emergency Medical Services (121 citations) and Atmospheric Science (336 citations). Authors at National Institute of Disaster Management collaborate with scholars in India, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Disaster Prevention and Management An International Journal, Natural Hazards, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine and Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. Some of National Institute of Disaster Management's most productive authors include Chandrika Rao, M. Santosh, Anil K. Gupta, Piyoosh Rautela, Surya Parkash, Harjeet Kaur, Robert Bolin, Srimanta Gupta, Harsh K. Gupta and Manish Kumar Goyal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.