National Institute of Chemistry

180.8k citations
5.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Institute of Chemistry

5.3k papers receiving 175.4k citations

Peers

National Institute of Chemistry
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Catalysis 11.9k
  • Electrochemistry 8.9k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 19.8k
  • Bioengineering 5.8k
  • Materials Chemistry 43.2k
Replace Ruđer Bošković Institute with:
Ruđer Bošković Institute Croatia
University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague Czechia
University of Pardubice Czechia
Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials Czechia
AREA Science Park Italy
Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie Germany
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry Czechia
BASF (Germany) Germany
Institute of Physical Chemistry Poland
Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering Switzerland
National Institute of Chemistry relative to Ruđer Bošković Institute Croatia Ruđer Bošković Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Ruđer Bošković Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Chemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Chemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Chemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Chemistry more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Chemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Chemistry at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Chemistry at the time of their publication.

About National Institute of Chemistry

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Chemistry have published 5.6k papers, which have received a total of 180.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 311 papers in Catalysis, 232 papers in Electrochemistry, 545 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, 178 papers in Bioengineering and 424 papers in Polymers and Plastics on the topics of Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (332 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (281 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (240 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (232 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (209 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (207 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (203 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (199 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Catalysis (11.9k citations), Electrochemistry (8.9k citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (19.8k citations), Bioengineering (5.8k citations) and Materials Chemistry (43.2k citations). Authors at National Institute of Chemistry collaborate with scholars in Slovenia, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of Power Sources, Electrochimica Acta, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling and Molecules. Some of National Institute of Chemistry's most productive authors include Blaž Likozar, Miran Gaberšček, Robert Dominko, Milan Randić, Albin Pintar, Roman Jerala, Boris Orel, Janez Levec, Božidar Ogorevc and Janez Jamnik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact