National Center for Clinical Laboratories

11.4k citations
642 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Center for Clinical Laboratories

598 papers receiving 11.4k citations

Peers

National Center for Clinical Laboratories
Comparison fields: 5 of 177
  • Clinical Biochemistry 474
  • Cancer Research 1.1k
  • Infectious Diseases 1.4k
  • Physiology 1.2k
  • Molecular Biology 2.5k
Replace Tianjin Children's Hospital with:
Tianjin Children's Hospital China
The 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army China
Institute of Health Service and Transfusion Medicine China
307th Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army China
Qingdao Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention China
Shandong Maternal and Child Health Hospital China
Henan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention China
Changping Laboratory China
Hebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention China
Wuhan Institute of Bioengineering China
National Center for Clinical Laboratories relative to Tianjin Children's Hospital China Tianjin Children's Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Tianjin Children's Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Center for Clinical Laboratories

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Center for Clinical Laboratories. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Center for Clinical Laboratories with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Center for Clinical Laboratories more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Center for Clinical Laboratories

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Center for Clinical Laboratories at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Center for Clinical Laboratories at the time of their publication.

About National Center for Clinical Laboratories

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Center for Clinical Laboratories have published 642 papers, which have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 208 papers in Physiology, 25 papers in Clinical Biochemistry, 46 papers in Cancer Research, 51 papers in Infectious Diseases and 10 papers in Virology on the topics of Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (200 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (29 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (27 papers), SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (24 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (19 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (16 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (13 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Biochemistry (474 citations), Cancer Research (1.1k citations), Infectious Diseases (1.4k citations), Physiology (1.2k citations) and Molecular Biology (2.5k citations). Authors at National Center for Clinical Laboratories collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Clinica Chimica Acta, Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, PLoS ONE and Clinical Chemistry. Some of National Center for Clinical Laboratories's most productive authors include Jinming Li, Lunan Wang, Le Chang, Rui Zhang, Ying Yan, Guigao Lin, Dongsheng Han, Yanxi Han, Rongxue Peng and Gaowei Fan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact