Changping Laboratory

13.6k citations
682 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Changping Laboratory

572 papers receiving 13.5k citations

Peers

Changping Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Infectious Diseases 3.4k
  • Oncology 1.8k
  • Immunology 1.3k
  • Molecular Biology 3.3k
  • Health Informatics 97
Replace State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology with:
State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology
The 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army China
Institute of Laboratory Animal Science China
Institute of Health Service and Transfusion Medicine China
State Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases
China International Science and Technology Cooperation China
The Military General Hospital of Beijing PLA China
National Center for Clinical Laboratories China
General Hospital of Central Theater Command
Tianjin Third Central Hospital China
Changping Laboratory relative to State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Changping Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Changping Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Changping Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Changping Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Changping Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Changping Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Changping Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About Changping Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Changping Laboratory have published 682 papers, which have received a total of 13.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 93 papers in Infectious Diseases, 8 papers in Structural Biology, 23 papers in Neurology, 187 papers in Molecular Biology and 7 papers in Health Informatics on the topics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (77 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (33 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (28 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (21 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (19 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (19 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (17 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Infectious Diseases (3.4k citations), Oncology (1.8k citations), Immunology (1.3k citations), Molecular Biology (3.3k citations) and Health Informatics (97 citations). Authors at Changping Laboratory collaborate with scholars in China, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Nature Communications, Nature, Cell, Cell Discovery and Science Advances. Some of Changping Laboratory's most productive authors include Ge Gao, Zhi‐Jie Cao, Zemin Zhang, Yunlong Cao, Fanchong Jian, Dongfang Wang, Weiliang Song, Baolin Liu, Zhibo Liu and Youchun Wang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact