Magee-Womens Research Institute
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.5%
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Microbiology top 2%
- Reproductive tract infections research
Papers in
-
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies 397
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management 143
- Microbiology 268
- Reproductive tract infections research 258
- Top scholars
- James M. RobertsCarl A. HubelKirk P. ConradSharon L. HillierYoel SadovskyLisa M. BodnarKyle E. OrwigHyagriv N. Simhan
- Journals
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (164 papers)Obstetrics and Gynecology (90 papers)Placenta (70 papers)PLoS ONE (58 papers)Contraception (58 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Magee-Womens Research Institute
2.4k papers receiving 101.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 28.3k
- Microbiology 9.8k
- Reproductive Medicine 9.9k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 19.0k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 18.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Magee-Womens Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Magee-Womens Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Magee-Womens Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Magee-Womens Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Magee-Womens Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Magee-Womens Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Magee-Womens Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About Magee-Womens Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Magee-Womens Research Institute have published 2.8k papers, which have received a total of 117.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 546 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 268 papers in Microbiology, 242 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 409 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 89 papers in Virology on the topics of Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (397 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (258 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (197 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (155 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (143 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (130 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (127 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (119 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Obstetrics and Gynecology (28.3k citations), Microbiology (9.8k citations), Reproductive Medicine (9.9k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (19.0k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (18.1k citations). Authors at Magee-Womens Research Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Placenta, PLoS ONE and Contraception. Some of Magee-Womens Research Institute's most productive authors include James M. Roberts, Carl A. Hubel, Kirk P. Conrad, Sharon L. Hillier, Yoel Sadovsky, Lisa M. Bodnar, Kyle E. Orwig, Hyagriv N. Simhan, William H. Walker and Robert W. Powers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.