Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science
Impact in
- Demography top 2%
- Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
- Linguistics and Language top 2%
- Multilingual Education and Policy
- Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Papers in
-
- Urban and sociocultural dynamics 49
-
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration 236
- Religion and Society Interactions 107
- Migration and Labor Dynamics 36
- Top scholars
- Steven VertovecPeter van der VeerSusanne FrieseAyelet ShacharSusanne WessendorfMarian BurchardtAbdou Maliq SimoneRobin A. Cohen
- Journals
- Ethnic and Racial Studies (31 papers)Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (21 papers)Citizenship Studies (11 papers)Comparative Migration Studies (8 papers)Social Compass (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science
886 papers receiving 22.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
- Demography 3.6k
- Linguistics and Language 1.3k
- Sociology and Political Science 11.1k
- Urban Studies 1.5k
- Religious studies 963
Countries citing scholars working at Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science at the time of their publication.
About Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science have published 964 papers, which have received a total of 22.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 87 papers in Urban Studies, 574 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 101 papers in Religious studies, 118 papers in Demography and 94 papers in Philosophy on the topics of Migration, Refugees, and Integration (236 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (107 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (102 papers), Urban and sociocultural dynamics (49 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (47 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (43 papers), South Asian Studies and Diaspora (39 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (36 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Demography (3.6k citations), Linguistics and Language (1.3k citations), Sociology and Political Science (11.1k citations), Urban Studies (1.5k citations) and Religious studies (963 citations). Authors at Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science collaborate with scholars in Germany, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Ethnic and Racial Studies, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Citizenship Studies, Comparative Migration Studies and Social Compass. Some of Max Planck Institute for Political and Social Science's most productive authors include Steven Vertovec, Peter van der Veer, Susanne Friese, Ayelet Shachar, Susanne Wessendorf, Marian Burchardt, Abdou Maliq Simone, Robin A. Cohen, Fran Meissner and Karen Schönwälder.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.