Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
Impact in
- Insect Science top 0.2%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Plant Science top 1%
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Papers in
- Insect Science 1.4k
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 822
- Insect and Pesticide Research 480
-
- Plant and animal studies 729
- Top scholars
- Ian T. BaldwinJonathan GershenzonThomas Mitchell‐OldsWilhelm BolandAxel MithöferDavid G. HeckelBill S. HanssonHeiko Vogel
- Journals
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (140 papers)Journal of Chemical Ecology (122 papers)PLoS ONE (110 papers)Phytochemistry (101 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (97 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
3.7k papers receiving 210.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
- Insect Science 71.8k
- Plant Science 101.2k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 48.0k
- Molecular Biology 81.7k
- Genetics 23.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology at the time of their publication.
About Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology have published 3.9k papers, which have received a total of 219.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.4k papers in Insect Science, 940 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1.5k papers in Plant Science, 393 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 1.4k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (822 papers), Plant and animal studies (729 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (555 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (480 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (450 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (397 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (389 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (217 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Insect Science (71.8k citations), Plant Science (101.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (48.0k citations), Molecular Biology (81.7k citations) and Genetics (23.1k citations). Authors at Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Chemical Ecology, PLoS ONE, Phytochemistry and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology's most productive authors include Ian T. Baldwin, Jonathan Gershenzon, Thomas Mitchell‐Olds, Wilhelm Boland, Axel Mithöfer, David G. Heckel, Bill S. Hansson, Heiko Vogel, André Keßler and Aleš Svatoš.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.