Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
Impact in
- Insect Science top 0.2%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Plant Science top 1%
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Papers in
- Insect Science 1.4k
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 833
- Insect and Pesticide Research 483
-
- Plant and animal studies 749
- Top scholars
- Ian Thomas BaldwinJonathan GershenzonThomas Mitchell‐OldsWilhelm BolandDavid G. HeckelAxel Mith ferBill S. HanssonHeiko Vogel
- Journals
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (141 papers)Journal of Chemical Ecology (123 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (109 papers)PLoS ONE (109 papers)Phytochemistry (102 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
3.7k papers receiving 219.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
- Insect Science 74.4k
- Plant Science 104.5k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 49.9k
- Molecular Biology 84.7k
- Genetics 24.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology at the time of their publication.
About Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology have published 3.9k papers, which have received a total of 229.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.4k papers in Insect Science, 962 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1.5k papers in Plant Science, 404 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 1.5k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (833 papers), Plant and animal studies (749 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (568 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (483 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (453 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (405 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (400 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (222 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Insect Science (74.4k citations), Plant Science (104.5k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (49.9k citations), Molecular Biology (84.7k citations) and Genetics (24.6k citations). Authors at Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Chemical Ecology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Phytochemistry. Some of Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology's most productive authors include Ian Thomas Baldwin, Jonathan Gershenzon, Thomas Mitchell‐Olds, Wilhelm Boland, David G. Heckel, Axel Mith fer, Bill S. Hansson, Heiko Vogel, André Keßler and Aleš Svatoš.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.