Mount Royal University

40.4k citations
2.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Mount Royal University

2.5k papers receiving 40.3k citations

Peers

Mount Royal University
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Library and Information Sciences 428
  • Research and Theory 390
  • Leadership and Management 193
  • Education 3.8k
  • Clinical Psychology 2.1k
Replace Athabasca University with:
Athabasca University Canada
MacEwan University Canada
Central Washington University United States
Eastern Washington University United States
University of Northern British Columbia Canada
University of Washington Bothell United States
Gonzaga University United States
University of Washington Tacoma United States
Western Washington University United States
University of Portland United States
Mount Royal University relative to Athabasca University Canada Athabasca University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Athabasca University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Mount Royal University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Mount Royal University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Mount Royal University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mount Royal University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Mount Royal University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Mount Royal University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Mount Royal University at the time of their publication.

About Mount Royal University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Mount Royal University have published 2.8k papers, which have received a total of 40.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 44 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 114 papers in Health, 42 papers in Research and Theory, 338 papers in Education and 18 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects on the topics of Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (83 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (65 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (57 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (42 papers), Nursing education and management (42 papers), Online and Blended Learning (41 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (41 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (41 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Library and Information Sciences (428 citations), Research and Theory (390 citations), Leadership and Management (193 citations), Education (3.8k citations) and Clinical Psychology (2.1k citations). Authors at Mount Royal University collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal, PLoS ONE, The Spine Journal, Journal of Applied Physiology and Religion. Some of Mount Royal University's most productive authors include Alain Morin, Mark R. Lafave, Christy Tomkins‐Lane, Jill A. Parnell, Norman D. Vaughan, Bob Uttl, Lorenzo Ardito, Raylene A. Reimer, Leah K. Hamilton and April L. McGrath.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact