Museum of the Rockies

13.3k citations
365 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Museum of the Rockies

325 papers receiving 13.0k citations

Peers

Museum of the Rockies
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
  • Paleontology 8.4k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.3k
  • Developmental Biology 398
  • Geometry and Topology 649
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.5k
Replace Natural History Museum of Utah with:
Natural History Museum of Utah United States
Museum Of Northern Arizona United States
The Peregrine Fund United States
College of Idaho United States
Los Angeles County Museum of Art United States
Walla Walla University United States
Luxel (United States) United States
Utah Tech University United States
Crow Canyon Archaeological Center United States
Allan Hancock College United States
Museum of the Rockies relative to Natural History Museum of Utah United States Natural History Museum of Utah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Natural History Museum of Utah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Museum of the Rockies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Museum of the Rockies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Museum of the Rockies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Museum of the Rockies more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Museum of the Rockies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Museum of the Rockies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Museum of the Rockies at the time of their publication.

About Museum of the Rockies

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Museum of the Rockies have published 365 papers, which have received a total of 13.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 168 papers in Paleontology, 83 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 3 papers in Developmental Biology, 29 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 6 papers in Applied Psychology on the topics of Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (158 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (121 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (74 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (26 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (11 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (10 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (10 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (8.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.3k citations), Developmental Biology (398 citations), Geometry and Topology (649 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (1.5k citations). Authors at Museum of the Rockies collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, PLoS ONE, Nature, Science and Paleobiology. Some of Museum of the Rockies's most productive authors include John R. Horner, Kevin Padian, David J. Varricchio, Mary H. Schweitzer, Armand de Ricqlès, Mark B. Goodwin, Holly N. Woodward, Frankie D. Jackson, John B. Scannella and Erick Greene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact