ELSA

237 papers receiving 9.7k citations

Peers

ELSA
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
  • Environmental Engineering 1.9k
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 953
  • Soil Science 855
  • Ecology 2.3k
  • Pollution 1.0k
Replace Groupe de Recherche en Agriculture Biologique with:
Groupe de Recherche en Agriculture Biologique France
Centro Ricerche Produzioni Animali Italy
Arvalis - Institut du Végétal France
Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research Switzerland
International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies France
Fonctionnement agroécologique et performances des systèmes de culture horticoles France
Laboratoire Agronomie et Environnement France
Colmar Inra Research Centre France
JUNIA France
Nürtingen-Geislingen University of Applied Science Germany
ELSA relative to Groupe de Recherche en Agriculture Biologique France Groupe de Recherche en Agriculture Biologique's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.1×
Groupe de Recherche en Agriculture Biologique · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at ELSA

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at ELSA. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at ELSA with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ELSA more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at ELSA

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with ELSA at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with ELSA at the time of their publication.

About ELSA

In recent decades, authors affiliated with ELSA have published 269 papers, which have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 57 papers in Environmental Engineering, 25 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 11 papers in Gastroenterology, 52 papers in Ecology and 27 papers in Water Science and Technology on the topics of Environmental Impact and Sustainability (54 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (24 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (20 papers), Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies (18 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (15 papers), Water resources management and optimization (15 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (14 papers) and Wastewater Treatment and Reuse (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Environmental Engineering (1.9k citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (953 citations), Soil Science (855 citations), Ecology (2.3k citations) and Pollution (1.0k citations). Authors at ELSA collaborate with scholars in France, Netherlands and United States and have published in prestigious journals including The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Journal of Cleaner Production, The Science of The Total Environment, Soil Biology and Biochemistry and Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. Some of ELSA's most productive authors include Jan Dirk van Elsas, Jan Dirk van Elsas, Paolina Garbeva, Johannes A. van Veen, Eléonore Loiseau, Philippe Roux, Arnaud Hélias, Joana Falcão Salles, J.A. Warmink and Rashid Nazir.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact