Manchester Metropolitan University

623k citations
23.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Manchester Metropolitan University

21.5k papers receiving 622.4k citations

Peers

Manchester Metropolitan University
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 25k
  • Ecological Modeling 4.7k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 11.6k
  • Electrochemistry 4.2k
  • Marketing 12.3k
Replace University of Bath with:
University of Bath United Kingdom
Loughborough University United Kingdom
University of Aberdeen United Kingdom
University of Exeter United Kingdom
University of York United Kingdom
University of East Anglia United Kingdom
Trinity College Dublin Ireland
University of Hull United Kingdom
Swansea University United Kingdom
University of Surrey United Kingdom
Manchester Metropolitan University relative to University of Bath United Kingdom University of Bath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
University of Bath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Manchester Metropolitan University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Manchester Metropolitan University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Manchester Metropolitan University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manchester Metropolitan University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Manchester Metropolitan University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Manchester Metropolitan University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Manchester Metropolitan University at the time of their publication.

About Manchester Metropolitan University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Manchester Metropolitan University have published 23.1k papers, which have received a total of 623k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 698 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 2.4k papers in Sociology and Political Science, 150 papers in Electrochemistry, 438 papers in Marketing and 455 papers in Gender Studies on the topics of Sports Performance and Training (434 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (319 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (319 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (269 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (256 papers), Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (227 papers), Physical Education and Sports Studies (208 papers) and Crystal structures of chemical compounds (207 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (25k citations), Ecological Modeling (4.7k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (11.6k citations), Electrochemistry (4.2k citations) and Marketing (12.3k citations). Authors at Manchester Metropolitan University collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, IEEE Access, European Journal of Applied Physiology, Scientific Reports and Polymer Degradation and Stability. Some of Manchester Metropolitan University's most productive authors include Craig Edward Banks, Jennifer Rowley, Alan H. Fielding, Louis Cohen, Keith Morrison, Lawrence Manion, Eleuterio Francisco Toro, Marco Vincenzo Narici, Constantinos N. Maganaris and Michael Wooldridge.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact