Maternité Port Royal

97.2k citations
3.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Maternité Port Royal

2.8k papers receiving 81.5k citations

Peers

Maternité Port Royal
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 10.8k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 15.3k
  • Reproductive Medicine 5.5k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 11.1k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 2.3k
Replace Hôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul with:
Hôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul France
Hôpital Robert-Debré France
Hôpital Armand-Trousseau France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours France
Institut Cochin France
St. Mary's Hospital United Kingdom
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL United Kingdom
Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine France
North Middlesex Hospital United Kingdom
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Belgium
Maternité Port Royal relative to Hôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul France Hôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Hôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Maternité Port Royal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Maternité Port Royal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Maternité Port Royal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maternité Port Royal more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Maternité Port Royal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Maternité Port Royal at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Maternité Port Royal at the time of their publication.

About Maternité Port Royal

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Maternité Port Royal have published 3.4k papers, which have received a total of 97.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 414 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 650 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 188 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 88 papers in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and 3 papers in Medical Terminology on the topics of Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (239 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (160 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (148 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (123 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (121 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (120 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (104 papers) and Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (100 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Obstetrics and Gynecology (10.8k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (15.3k citations), Reproductive Medicine (5.5k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (11.1k citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (2.3k citations). Authors at Maternité Port Royal collaborate with scholars in France, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Human Reproduction, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Prenatal Diagnosis. Some of Maternité Port Royal's most productive authors include Yehezkel Ben‐Ari, François Goffinet, E Papiernik, Charles Chapron, Claudine Amiel‐Tison, Constantino Sotelo, Laurent Mandelbrot, DOMINIQUE CABROL, Barbara S. Polla and J B Dubuisson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact