Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum
Impact in
- Paleontology top 1%
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
-
- Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Papers in
- Paleontology 1.4k
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies 925
- Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology 562
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 367
- Plant and animal studies 341
- Top scholars
- Fernando E. NovasMartín D. EzcurraFederico L. AgnolínJosé F. BonaparteJorge F. GeniseSérgio ArchangelskyJulia B. DesojoDemetrio Boltovskoy
- Journals
- Zootaxa (199 papers)Journal of South American Earth Sciences (108 papers)Cretaceous Research (101 papers)Polar Biology (72 papers)Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology (66 papers)
- Partner nations
- ArgentinaUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum
3.8k papers receiving 70.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
- Paleontology 29.8k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 18.3k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 18.0k
- Ecological Modeling 2.9k
- Ecology 16.9k
Countries citing scholars working at Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum at the time of their publication.
About Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum have published 4.1k papers, which have received a total of 71.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.4k papers in Paleontology, 1.3k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 800 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 1.0k papers in Ecology and 741 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Evolution and Paleontology Studies (925 papers), Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (562 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (435 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (418 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (367 papers), Plant and animal studies (341 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (340 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (305 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (29.8k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (18.3k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (18.0k citations), Ecological Modeling (2.9k citations) and Ecology (16.9k citations). Authors at Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum collaborate with scholars in Argentina, United States and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Journal of South American Earth Sciences, Cretaceous Research, Polar Biology and Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. Some of Bernardino Rivadavia Natural Sciences Museum's most productive authors include Fernando E. Novas, Martín D. Ezcurra, Federico L. Agnolín, José F. Bonaparte, Jorge F. Genise, Sérgio Archangelsky, Julia B. Desojo, Demetrio Boltovskoy, Sebastián Apesteguı́a and Pablo L. Tubaro.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.