Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago
Impact in
-
- Numerical methods in engineering
- Composite Material Mechanics
-
- Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
- Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Papers in
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 26
- Philosophy 36
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 15
- Top scholars
- Bradley N. MakerJeffrey A. WeissSanjay GovindjeeCheng WuZeliang LiuPhilip HefnerNielen StanderM. Koishi
- Journals
- Zygon® (47 papers)Computational Mechanics (12 papers)SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series (8 papers)Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering (7 papers)Church History (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaFrance
In The Last Decade
Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago
253 papers receiving 4.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 198
- Mechanics of Materials 1.8k
- Computational Mechanics 1.2k
- Civil and Structural Engineering 980
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 198
- Mechanical Engineering 846
Countries citing scholars working at Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago at the time of their publication.
About Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago have published 289 papers, which have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 40 papers in Religious studies, 36 papers in Philosophy, 14 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 70 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 44 papers in Computational Mechanics on the topics of Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (27 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (27 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (26 papers), Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (22 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (16 papers), Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions (16 papers), Metallurgy and Material Forming (16 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Mechanics of Materials (1.8k citations), Computational Mechanics (1.2k citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (980 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (198 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (846 citations). Authors at Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago collaborate with scholars in United States, China and France and have published in prestigious journals including Zygon®, Computational Mechanics, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering and Church History. Some of Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago's most productive authors include Bradley N. Maker, Jeffrey A. Weiss, Sanjay Govindjee, Cheng Wu, Zeliang Liu, Philip Hefner, Nielen Stander, M. Koishi, C.T. Wu and M. Souli.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.