Life Sciences Institute

95.7k citations
1.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Life Sciences Institute

1.7k papers receiving 94.4k citations

Peers

Life Sciences Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Biochemistry 2.6k
  • Molecular Biology 25.9k
  • Aging 547
  • Rheumatology 3.7k
  • Organic Chemistry 8k
Replace Cancer Science Institute of Singapore with:
Cancer Science Institute of Singapore Singapore
Singapore Immunology Network Singapore
Institute of Medical Biology Singapore
Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory Singapore
Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering Singapore
Chulabhorn Research Institute Thailand
Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health China
Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University China
Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory China
Hainan General Hospital China
Life Sciences Institute relative to Cancer Science Institute of Singapore Singapore Cancer Science Institute of Singapore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Cancer Science Institute of Singapore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Life Sciences Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Life Sciences Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Life Sciences Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Life Sciences Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Life Sciences Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Life Sciences Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Life Sciences Institute at the time of their publication.

About Life Sciences Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Life Sciences Institute have published 1.7k papers, which have received a total of 95.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 73 papers in Biochemistry, 15 papers in Aging, 475 papers in Molecular Biology, 112 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 21 papers in Developmental Neuroscience on the topics of Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (97 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (60 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (59 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (55 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (50 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (48 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (45 papers) and Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (43 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biochemistry (2.6k citations), Molecular Biology (25.9k citations), Aging (547 citations), Rheumatology (3.7k citations) and Organic Chemistry (8k citations). Authors at Life Sciences Institute collaborate with scholars in Singapore, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Autophagy, Chemical Communications, Scientific Reports, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE. Some of Life Sciences Institute's most productive authors include Daniel H. Huson, Chao Xie, Benjamin Buchfink, Yixin Lü, Daniel J. Klionsky, Stephen J. Weiss, Young‐Tae Chang, Rowena Green Matthews, Wei Seong Toh and W.S. Fred Wong.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact