Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research

10.7k citations
540 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research

409 papers receiving 8.1k citations

Peers

Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Clinical Psychology 3.3k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 385
  • Biological Psychiatry 233
  • Applied Psychology 458
  • Neurology 474
Replace Reinier van Arkel with:
Reinier van Arkel Netherlands
Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbek Germany
Universitäre Psychiatrische Dienste Bern Switzerland
Baum Consult Germany
Arkin Netherlands
GGZ Drenthe Netherlands
Lentis Netherlands
Vincent Van Gogh Voor Geestelijke Gezondheidszorg Netherlands
Karakter Netherlands
Schön Klinik Roseneck Germany
Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research relative to Reinier van Arkel Netherlands Reinier van Arkel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Reinier van Arkel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research at the time of their publication.

About Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research have published 540 papers, which have received a total of 10.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 47 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 25 papers in Biological Psychiatry, 137 papers in Clinical Psychology, 30 papers in Applied Psychology and 96 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience on the topics of Resilience and Mental Health (59 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (47 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (44 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (38 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (33 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (27 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (27 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (3.3k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (385 citations), Biological Psychiatry (233 citations), Applied Psychology (458 citations) and Neurology (474 citations). Authors at Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research collaborate with scholars in Germany, Netherlands and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, Brain stimulation, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Translational Psychiatry and Frontiers in Public Health. Some of Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research's most productive authors include Klaus Peter Lieb, Angela M. Kunzler, Sandra Prince‐Embury, Michèle Wessa, Thomas Rigotti, Oliver Tuescher, Jutta Marie Stoffers-Winterling, Til Ole Bergmann, Thomas Muenzel and Omar Hahad.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact