Lankenau Institute for Medical Research

65.4k citations
1.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Lankenau Institute for Medical Research

1.3k papers receiving 65.3k citations

Peers

Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
  • Biological Psychiatry 2.2k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 24.4k
  • Internal Medicine 1.6k
  • Oncology 5.8k
  • Neurology 3k
Replace Lankenau Medical Center with:
Lankenau Medical Center United States
Penn State Cancer Institute United States
Takeda Oncology (United States) United States
Hôpital Saint-Luc Canada
Maine Medical Center Research Institute United States
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Division of Intramural Research United States
Bayer (United States) United States
Kaleida Health United States
Magee-Womens Research Institute United States
Memorial Hospital United States
Lankenau Institute for Medical Research relative to Lankenau Medical Center United States Lankenau Medical Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×23.4×
Lankenau Medical Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Lankenau Institute for Medical Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Lankenau Institute for Medical Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Lankenau Institute for Medical Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lankenau Institute for Medical Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Lankenau Institute for Medical Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Lankenau Institute for Medical Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Lankenau Institute for Medical Research at the time of their publication.

About Lankenau Institute for Medical Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Lankenau Institute for Medical Research have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 65.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 456 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 16 papers in Biological Psychiatry, 11 papers in Aging, 126 papers in Oncology and 40 papers in Neurology on the topics of Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (164 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (157 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (78 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (51 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (48 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (44 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (43 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (37 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (2.2k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (24.4k citations), Internal Medicine (1.6k citations), Oncology (5.8k citations) and Neurology (3k citations). Authors at Lankenau Institute for Medical Research collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Voice, Cancer Research, Heart Rhythm, PLoS ONE and American Heart Journal. Some of Lankenau Institute for Medical Research's most productive authors include George C. Prendergast, Alexander J. Muller, Michael D. Ezekowitz, Stuart J. Connolly, Paul A. Reilly, Lars C. Wallentin, Salim Yusuf, James B. DuHadaway, Jonas Oldgren and Peter Russell Kowey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact