Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 2%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Papers in
-
- Tryptophan and brain disorders 55
-
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 179
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 101
- Top scholars
- Martin P. PaulusWayne Curtis DrevetsW. Kyle SimmonsJonathan B. SavitzJerzy BodurkaSahib S. KhalsaLisa Feldman BarrettRyan S. Smith
- Journals
- Biological Psychiatry (34 papers)Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (31 papers)PLoS ONE (28 papers)Neuropsychopharmacology (27 papers)Translational Psychiatry (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIran
In The Last Decade
Laureate Institute for Brain Research
985 papers receiving 42.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
- Biological Psychiatry 2.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 13.2k
- Clinical Psychology 7.2k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 5.6k
- Neurology 2.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Laureate Institute for Brain Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Laureate Institute for Brain Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Laureate Institute for Brain Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laureate Institute for Brain Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Laureate Institute for Brain Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Laureate Institute for Brain Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Laureate Institute for Brain Research at the time of their publication.
About Laureate Institute for Brain Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Laureate Institute for Brain Research have published 1k papers, which have received a total of 42.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 55 papers in Biological Psychiatry, 360 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 195 papers in Clinical Psychology, 148 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 63 papers in Neurology on the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (179 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (104 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (101 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (73 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (69 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (63 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (60 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (55 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (2.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (13.2k citations), Clinical Psychology (7.2k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (5.6k citations) and Neurology (2.1k citations). Authors at Laureate Institute for Brain Research collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Iran and have published in prestigious journals including Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, PLoS ONE, Neuropsychopharmacology and Translational Psychiatry. Some of Laureate Institute for Brain Research's most productive authors include Martin P. Paulus, Wayne Curtis Drevets, W. Kyle Simmons, Jonathan B. Savitz, Jerzy Bodurka, Sahib S. Khalsa, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Ryan S. Smith, Han Yuan and Vadim S. Zotev.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.