Local Government Association

10.4k citations
652 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Local Government Association

424 papers receiving 8.1k citations

Peers

Local Government Association
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
  • Public Administration 1.5k
  • Urban Studies 397
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.5k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 603
  • Safety Research 454
Replace Institute for Employment Studies with:
Institute for Employment Studies United Kingdom
Digital Catapult United Kingdom
Oxford Centre for Mission Studies United Kingdom
Centre for Social Justice United Kingdom
European Trade Union Institute Belgium
Hague Institute for Global Justice Netherlands
Macmillan Cancer Support United Kingdom
King's Fund United Kingdom
RAND Europe United Kingdom
Department for International Development United Kingdom
Local Government Association relative to Institute for Employment Studies United Kingdom Institute for Employment Studies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Institute for Employment Studies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Local Government Association

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Local Government Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Local Government Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Local Government Association more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Local Government Association

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Local Government Association at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Local Government Association at the time of their publication.

About Local Government Association

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Local Government Association have published 652 papers, which have received a total of 10.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 57 papers in Public Administration, 105 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 32 papers in Safety Research, 29 papers in Finance and 14 papers in Urban Studies on the topics of Public Policy and Administration Research (43 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (38 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (24 papers), Political Systems and Governance (23 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (23 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (14 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (14 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Public Administration (1.5k citations), Urban Studies (397 citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.5k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (603 citations) and Safety Research (454 citations). Authors at Local Government Association collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Local Government Studies, Public Administration, Public Money & Management, The British Journal of Social Work and Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit. Some of Local Government Association's most productive authors include Chris Skelcher, Steven Rathgeb Smith, John Stewart, Gillian Schofield, George M. Zinkhan, Jae Woo Hong, Manfred Lenzen, Lise-Lotte Pade, Jesper Munksgaard and Rhys Andrews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact