Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
Impact in
- Emergency Medicine top 2%
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- General Health Professions top 2%
Papers in
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 130
-
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 129
- Top scholars
- David A. AschScott D. HalpernKatrina ArmstrongRachel M. WernerJeffrey H. SilberMark V. PaulyChris FeudtnerDaniel E. Polsky
- Journals
- JAMA Network Open (191 papers)Journal of General Internal Medicine (130 papers)Medical Care (109 papers)PEDIATRICS (87 papers)New England Journal of Medicine (64 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
4.3k papers receiving 139.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
- Emergency Medicine 9k
- General Health Professions 20.3k
- Family Practice 1.7k
- Health 6.1k
- Health Information Management 5.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics at the time of their publication.
About Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics have published 4.6k papers, which have received a total of 139.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 842 papers in General Health Professions, 293 papers in Emergency Medicine, 271 papers in Health Information Management, 240 papers in Health and 93 papers in Research and Theory on the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (503 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (144 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (141 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (131 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (130 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (130 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (129 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (117 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Emergency Medicine (9k citations), General Health Professions (20.3k citations), Family Practice (1.7k citations), Health (6.1k citations) and Health Information Management (5.8k citations). Authors at Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including JAMA Network Open, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Medical Care, PEDIATRICS and New England Journal of Medicine. Some of Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics's most productive authors include David A. Asch, Scott D. Halpern, Katrina Armstrong, Rachel M. Werner, Jeffrey H. Silber, Mark V. Pauly, Chris Feudtner, Daniel E. Polsky, Kevin G.M. Volpp and Judy A. Shea.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.