Lawrence Technological University

20.5k citations
1.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Lawrence Technological University

1.2k papers receiving 20.5k citations

Peers

Lawrence Technological University
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Waste Management and Disposal 742
  • Architecture 491
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 354
  • Biochemistry 506
  • Building and Construction 1.2k
Replace Kettering University with:
Kettering University United States
Purdue University Northwest United States
Purdue University in Indianapolis United States
Ohio Northern University United States
Iona College United States
Kean University United States
Rose–Hulman Institute of Technology United States
University of Wisconsin–Platteville United States
University of New Haven United States
Gannon University United States
Lawrence Technological University relative to Kettering University United States Kettering University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20.8×
Kettering University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Lawrence Technological University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Lawrence Technological University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Lawrence Technological University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lawrence Technological University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Lawrence Technological University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Lawrence Technological University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Lawrence Technological University at the time of their publication.

About Lawrence Technological University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Lawrence Technological University have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 20.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 84 papers in Architecture, 41 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, 69 papers in Automotive Engineering, 50 papers in Media Technology and 91 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering on the topics of Engineering Education and Pedagogy (71 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (40 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (39 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (27 papers), Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems (25 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (24 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (23 papers) and Landfill Environmental Impact Studies (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Waste Management and Disposal (742 citations), Architecture (491 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (354 citations), Biochemistry (506 citations) and Building and Construction (1.2k citations). Authors at Lawrence Technological University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and China and have published in prestigious journals including SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Sustainability, IEEE Access, Journal of Structural Engineering and Energies. Some of Lawrence Technological University's most productive authors include Michael J. Cloud, Ramon E. Moore, Ralph Baker Kearfott, Lior Shamir, Donald D. Carpenter, Hanan Alhaddi, Trevor S. Harding, Cynthia Finelli, Joongsub Kim and Ahmed Jalil Al-Bayati.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact