Jeffrey Modell Foundation

31.0k citations
672 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Jeffrey Modell Foundation

580 papers receiving 26.5k citations

Peers

Jeffrey Modell Foundation
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 8.3k
  • Internal Medicine 968
  • Emergency Medicine 1.4k
  • Rehabilitation 706
  • Surgery 4.5k
Replace Dandenong Hospital with:
Dandenong Hospital Australia
National Trauma Research Institute Australia
Australian Centre for Heart Health Australia
Baird Institute Australia
Sydney Adventist Hospital Australia
Kidney Health Australia Australia
King George V Memorial Hospital Australia
National Australia Bank Australia
New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry Australia
Wesley Research Institute Australia
Jeffrey Modell Foundation relative to Dandenong Hospital Australia Dandenong Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.1×
Dandenong Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Jeffrey Modell Foundation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Jeffrey Modell Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Jeffrey Modell Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey Modell Foundation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Jeffrey Modell Foundation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Jeffrey Modell Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Jeffrey Modell Foundation at the time of their publication.

About Jeffrey Modell Foundation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Jeffrey Modell Foundation have published 672 papers, which have received a total of 31.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 18 papers in Internal Medicine, 80 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 22 papers in Rehabilitation, 106 papers in Epidemiology and 57 papers in Immunology on the topics of Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (73 papers), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (43 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (29 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (19 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (18 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (18 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (14 papers) and Peripheral Artery Disease Management (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (8.3k citations), Internal Medicine (968 citations), Emergency Medicine (1.4k citations), Rehabilitation (706 citations) and Surgery (4.5k citations). Authors at Jeffrey Modell Foundation collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Circulation, Stroke, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Science and Immunologic Research. Some of Jeffrey Modell Foundation's most productive authors include Jeffrey L. Saver, Jeffrey A. Towbin, Dirk Jenter, Barry J. Maron, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Joost de Winter, Samuel D. Gosling, Jeff Potter, Clyde W. Yancy and Roger Simnett.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact