Johannes Kepler University of Linz

21.5k papers receiving 475.9k citations

Peers

Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Polymers and Plastics 47.9k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 114.9k
  • Software 8.6k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 57.1k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 25.2k
Replace University of Trento with:
University of Trento Italy
Graz University of Technology Austria
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Germany
Technische Universität Dresden Germany
Technische Universität Berlin Germany
University of Milano-Bicocca Italy
University of Kaiserslautern Germany
TU Wien Austria
Technische Universität Darmstadt Germany
Politecnico di Milano Italy
Johannes Kepler University of Linz relative to University of Trento Italy University of Trento's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
University of Trento · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Johannes Kepler University of Linz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Johannes Kepler University of Linz. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Johannes Kepler University of Linz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johannes Kepler University of Linz more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Johannes Kepler University of Linz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Johannes Kepler University of Linz at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Johannes Kepler University of Linz at the time of their publication.

About Johannes Kepler University of Linz

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Johannes Kepler University of Linz have published 24.0k papers, which have received a total of 495.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 661 papers in Software, 1.7k papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 2.8k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 371 papers in Algebra and Number Theory and 2.7k papers in Artificial Intelligence on the topics of Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (724 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (620 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (564 papers), Software Engineering Research (483 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (474 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (397 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (396 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (391 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Polymers and Plastics (47.9k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (114.9k citations), Software (8.6k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (57.1k citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (25.2k citations). Authors at Johannes Kepler University of Linz collaborate with scholars in Austria, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Applied Physics Letters, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Physical Review B, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physical Review Letters. Some of Johannes Kepler University of Linz's most productive authors include Niyazi Serdar Sariçiftçi, Friedrich Schneider, D. Bäuerle, Siegfried Bauer, Christoph J. Brabec, Helmut Neugebauer, Edwin Lughofer, Harald Hoppe, Erich Peter Klement and Peter Hinterdorfer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact