Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México
Impact in
- Finance top 5%
- Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Papers in
- Finance 136
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 62
- Top scholars
- Ignacio N. LobatoJosé Luis MoralesJorge NocedalMark HuggettDirk De ClercqMaría TriguerosImanol BelausteguigoitiaCésar Martinelli
- Journals
- Journal of Economic Theory (20 papers)Journal of Development Economics (18 papers)Economic Theory (16 papers)Automatica (14 papers)IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- MexicoUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México
2k papers receiving 30.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
- Finance 2.9k
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.7k
- Economics and Econometrics 4.4k
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.6k
- Accounting 1.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México at the time of their publication.
About Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México have published 2.3k papers, which have received a total of 30.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 136 papers in Finance, 96 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 253 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 141 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 301 papers in Political Science and International Relations on the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (75 papers), Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (63 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (63 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (62 papers), Political Dynamics in Latin America (60 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (44 papers), Control Systems and Identification (43 papers) and Control and Stability of Dynamical Systems (43 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Finance (2.9k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (1.7k citations), Economics and Econometrics (4.4k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.6k citations) and Accounting (1.4k citations). Authors at Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México collaborate with scholars in Mexico, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Economic Theory, Journal of Development Economics, Economic Theory, Automatica and IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. Some of Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México's most productive authors include Ignacio N. Lobato, José Luis Morales, Jorge Nocedal, Mark Huggett, Dirk De Clercq, María Trigueros, Imanol Belausteguigoitia, César Martinelli, Claudia N. González-Brambila and Vı́ctor M. Guerrero.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.