Institute of Art

74.5k citations
2.0k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Art

1.6k papers receiving 73.0k citations

Peers

Institute of Art
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
  • Biochemistry 3.6k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 7.2k
  • Molecular Biology 27.7k
  • Physiology 10.2k
  • Cell Biology 6.1k
Replace University Hospital Brno with:
University Hospital Brno Czechia
St. Anne's University Hospital Brno Czechia
Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine Poland
Institute of Human Genetics Poland
University Hospital Magdeburg Germany
Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences Poland
University of Hradec Králové Czechia
BioTechMed-Graz Austria
HUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont Hungary
Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Czechia
Institute of Art relative to University Hospital Brno Czechia University Hospital Brno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
University Hospital Brno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Art

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Art. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Art with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Art more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Art

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Art at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Art at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Art

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Art have published 2.0k papers, which have received a total of 74.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 287 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 26 papers in Music, 78 papers in History, 53 papers in Biochemistry and 221 papers in Artificial Intelligence on the topics of Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland (69 papers), Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (64 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (62 papers), Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (60 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (53 papers), Human Pose and Action Recognition (52 papers), Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning (50 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (47 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biochemistry (3.6k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (7.2k citations), Molecular Biology (27.7k citations), Physiology (10.2k citations) and Cell Biology (6.1k citations). Authors at Institute of Art collaborate with scholars in Poland, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Some of Institute of Art's most productive authors include Martin Rodbell, Jesse Roth, Samuel W. Cushman, Lawrence J. Wardzala, H.G. Windmueller, William B. Jakoby, Petra Kleinbongard, Jana Havránková, Michael Brownstein and Jinxuan Liu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact