Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave
Impact in
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Quality and Management Systems
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Papers in
-
- Collaboration in agile enterprises 41
- Top scholars
- Gilberto SantosBruno Barbosa SousaRicardo SimõesSenentxu Lanceros-MéndezSérgio Dominique‐FerreiraMaria Manuela Cruz-CunhaVítor SencadasBeatriz Aibar Guzmán
In The Last Decade
Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave
1.4k papers receiving 20.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 221
- Strategy and Management 3.3k
- Management Information Systems 1.5k
- Marketing 886
- Management of Technology and Innovation 777
Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave at the time of their publication.
About Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave have published 1.7k papers, which have received a total of 20.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 21 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 97 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 111 papers in Management Information Systems, 168 papers in Strategy and Management and 66 papers in Human-Computer Interaction on the topics of Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (135 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (44 papers), Collaboration in agile enterprises (41 papers), Quality and Supply Management (41 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (41 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (40 papers), Quality and Management Systems (38 papers) and Usability and User Interface Design (37 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (221 citations), Strategy and Management (3.3k citations), Management Information Systems (1.5k citations), Marketing (886 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (777 citations). Authors at Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave collaborate with scholars in Portugal, Spain and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Sustainability, Applied Sciences, Sensors, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management and Public Money & Management. Some of Universidade Politécnica do Cávado e do Ave's most productive authors include Gilberto Santos, Bruno Barbosa Sousa, Ricardo Simões, Senentxu Lanceros-Méndez, Sérgio Dominique‐Ferreira, Maria Manuela Cruz-Cunha, Vítor Sencadas, Beatriz Aibar Guzmán, Sónia María da Silva Monteiro and José Carlos Sá.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.