Institute of Nanotechnology
Impact in
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Graphene research and applications
-
- Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Papers in
- Materials Chemistry 1.2k
- Graphene research and applications 148
- Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties 115
- Top scholars
- Jürgen JanekWolfgang G. ZeierByung Hee HongJong‐Hyun AhnHouk JangJae‐Young ChoiChad A. MirkinKeun‐Soo Kim
- Journals
- RSC Advances (225 papers)Nanoscale (122 papers)Journal of Materials Chemistry A (99 papers)Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (91 papers)Dalton Transactions (73 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Institute of Nanotechnology
2.7k papers receiving 117.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
- Materials Chemistry 53.2k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 18.3k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 45.6k
- Polymers and Plastics 10.2k
- Biomedical Engineering 31.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Nanotechnology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Nanotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Nanotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Nanotechnology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Nanotechnology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Nanotechnology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Nanotechnology at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Nanotechnology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Nanotechnology have published 3.0k papers, which have received a total of 119.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.2k papers in Materials Chemistry, 400 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 232 papers in Polymers and Plastics, 920 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 655 papers in Biomedical Engineering on the topics of Advancements in Battery Materials (199 papers), Graphene research and applications (148 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (141 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (137 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (117 papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (116 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (115 papers) and Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (99 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Materials Chemistry (53.2k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (18.3k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (45.6k citations), Polymers and Plastics (10.2k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (31.4k citations). Authors at Institute of Nanotechnology collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including RSC Advances, Nanoscale, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics and Dalton Transactions. Some of Institute of Nanotechnology's most productive authors include Jürgen Janek, Wolfgang G. Zeier, Byung Hee Hong, Jong‐Hyun Ahn, Houk Jang, Jae‐Young Choi, Chad A. Mirkin, Keun‐Soo Kim, Kwang S. Kim and Jong Min Kim.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.