Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses
Impact in
- Toxicology top 5%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
-
- Forensic and Genetic Research
Papers in
- Toxicology 117
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 116
- Genetics 118
- Forensic and Genetic Research 111
- Top scholars
- Guillermo RepettoAna del PesoJorge L. ZuritaAntonio AlonsoManuel RepettoPablo Martı́nMaría A. MartínezMaría Paz Suárez-Mier
- Journals
- Forensic Science International (42 papers)Forensic Science International Genetics (26 papers)Journal of Analytical Toxicology (22 papers)International Journal of Legal Medicine (13 papers)Toxicology in Vitro (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomPortugal
In The Last Decade
Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses
384 papers receiving 10k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
- Toxicology 1.3k
- Genetics 2.6k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 477
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 770
- Emergency Medicine 254
Countries citing scholars working at Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses at the time of their publication.
About Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses have published 421 papers, which have received a total of 10k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 117 papers in Toxicology, 118 papers in Genetics, 31 papers in Emergency Medicine, 49 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 35 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging on the topics of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (116 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (111 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (35 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (26 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (25 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (17 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (15 papers) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Toxicology (1.3k citations), Genetics (2.6k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (477 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (770 citations) and Emergency Medicine (254 citations). Authors at Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses collaborate with scholars in Spain, United Kingdom and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Forensic Science International, Forensic Science International Genetics, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, International Journal of Legal Medicine and Toxicology in Vitro. Some of Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses's most productive authors include Guillermo Repetto, Ana del Peso, Jorge L. Zurita, Antonio Alonso, Manuel Repetto, Pablo Martı́n, María A. Martínez, María Paz Suárez-Mier, Manuel Sancho and Angeles M. Jos.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.