Institute of Aging

67.2k citations
1.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Aging

1.4k papers receiving 56.9k citations

Peers

Institute of Aging
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Aging 2.2k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.6k
  • Physiology 9.9k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 4.3k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 1.9k
Replace Framingham Heart Study with:
Framingham Heart Study United States
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada
Burke Medical Research Institute United States
Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital United States
Center for Pain and the Brain United States
Concord Hospital United States
Foundation Center United States
Center for Human Reproduction United States
Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center United States
Boston VA Research Institute United States
Institute of Aging relative to Framingham Heart Study United States Framingham Heart Study's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Framingham Heart Study · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Aging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Aging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Aging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Aging more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Aging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Aging at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Aging at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Aging

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Aging have published 1.7k papers, which have received a total of 67.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 40 papers in Aging, 32 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 174 papers in Physiology, 10 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and 10 papers in Family Practice on the topics of Immune Cell Function and Interaction (46 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (44 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (40 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (35 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (35 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (33 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (30 papers) and T-cell and B-cell Immunology (28 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aging (2.2k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (1.6k citations), Physiology (9.9k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4.3k citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (1.9k citations). Authors at Institute of Aging collaborate with scholars in Canada, Japan and United States and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Immunology, Artificial Organs, Scientific Reports, Cancer Science and The Journals of Gerontology Series A. Some of Institute of Aging's most productive authors include Martin Prince, Emiliano Albanese, Anders Wimo, Wagner Silva Ribeiro, Cleusa P. Ferri, William W. Seeley, Christiaan Leeuwenburgh, Matt Kaeberlein, Peter S. Rabinovitch and Simon C. Johnson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact