Framingham Heart Study

300.5k citations
2.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Framingham Heart Study

2.0k papers receiving 212.0k citations

Peers

Framingham Heart Study
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 107.8k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 34.7k
  • Nephrology 12.1k
  • Physiology 27.8k
  • Internal Medicine 2.8k
Replace Feinstein Institute for Medical Research with:
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research United States
Joslin Diabetes Center United States
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center United States
Regeneron (United States) United States
Biogen (United States) United States
Geisinger Medical Center United States
Population Health Research Institute Canada
Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval Canada
Center for Vascular Biology Research United States
May Institute United States
Framingham Heart Study relative to Feinstein Institute for Medical Research United States Feinstein Institute for Medical Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Framingham Heart Study

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Framingham Heart Study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Framingham Heart Study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Framingham Heart Study more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Framingham Heart Study

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Framingham Heart Study at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Framingham Heart Study at the time of their publication.

About Framingham Heart Study

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Framingham Heart Study have published 2.5k papers, which have received a total of 300.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 737 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 251 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 71 papers in Nephrology, 129 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 194 papers in Physiology on the topics of Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (178 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (176 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (157 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (147 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (132 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (120 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (107 papers) and Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (94 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (107.8k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (34.7k citations), Nephrology (12.1k citations), Physiology (27.8k citations) and Internal Medicine (2.8k citations). Authors at Framingham Heart Study collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Circulation, The American Journal of Cardiology, Journal of the American Heart Association, Alzheimer s & Dementia and American Heart Journal. Some of Framingham Heart Study's most productive authors include Daniel Levy, Ramachandran S. Vasan, William B. Kannel, Emelia J. Benjamin, Martin G. Larson, Peter W.F. Wilson, Ralph B. D’Agostino, Caroline S. Fox, William P. Castelli and Philip A. Wolf.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact