Center for Human Reproduction
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian function and disorders
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Sperm and Testicular Function
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 127
- Ovarian function and disorders 125
- Sperm and Testicular Function 24
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 71
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics 52
- Top scholars
- Norbert GleicherDavid H. BaradAndrea WeghoferVitaly A. KushnirDavid Fred AlbertiniKutluk OktaySarah K. DarmonÖzgür Öktem
- Journals
- Fertility and Sterility (114 papers)Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (56 papers)Human Reproduction (44 papers)Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology (42 papers)Reproductive BioMedicine Online (30 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Center for Human Reproduction
454 papers receiving 13.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
- Reproductive Medicine 6k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 2.4k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 5.9k
- Immunology 988
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 392
Countries citing scholars working at Center for Human Reproduction
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for Human Reproduction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for Human Reproduction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for Human Reproduction more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Center for Human Reproduction
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for Human Reproduction at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for Human Reproduction at the time of their publication.
About Center for Human Reproduction
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for Human Reproduction have published 472 papers, which have received a total of 13.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 256 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 112 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 206 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 37 papers in Immunology and 15 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology on the topics of Reproductive Biology and Fertility (189 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (127 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (125 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (71 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (52 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (37 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (24 papers) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Reproductive Medicine (6k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (2.4k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (5.9k citations), Immunology (988 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (392 citations). Authors at Center for Human Reproduction collaborate with scholars in United States, Austria and Israel and have published in prestigious journals including Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Human Reproduction, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology and Reproductive BioMedicine Online. Some of Center for Human Reproduction's most productive authors include Norbert Gleicher, David H. Barad, Andrea Weghofer, Vitaly A. Kushnir, David Fred Albertini, Kutluk Oktay, Sarah K. Darmon, Özgür Öktem, Huai L. Feng and Aritro Sen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.