National Biodiversity Institute

16.0k citations
1.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Biodiversity Institute

986 papers receiving 15.0k citations

Peers

National Biodiversity Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
  • Ecological Modeling 1.7k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.5k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 5.4k
  • Insect Science 1.7k
  • Ecology 3.3k
Replace Zamorano Pan-American Agricultural School with:
Zamorano Pan-American Agricultural School Honduras
Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología Panama
City of Knowledge Panama
Alexander von Humboldt Biological Resources Research Institute Colombia
Charles Darwin Foundation Ecuador
University of Quintana Roo Mexico
Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad Ecuador
National Agrarian University Nicaragua
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias Ecuador
Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente Cuba
National Biodiversity Institute relative to Zamorano Pan-American Agricultural School Honduras Zamorano Pan-American Agricultural School's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Zamorano Pan-American Agricultural School · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Biodiversity Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Biodiversity Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Biodiversity Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Biodiversity Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Biodiversity Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Biodiversity Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Biodiversity Institute at the time of their publication.

About National Biodiversity Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Biodiversity Institute have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 16.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 510 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 23 papers in Horticulture, 92 papers in Ecological Modeling, 175 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 49 papers in Forestry on the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (193 papers), Plant and animal studies (187 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (130 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (92 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (83 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (68 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (63 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (62 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (1.7k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.5k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (5.4k citations), Insect Science (1.7k citations) and Ecology (3.3k citations). Authors at National Biodiversity Institute collaborate with scholars in Costa Rica, South Africa and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, ZooKeys, Scientific Reports, Phytotaxa and Bothalia. Some of National Biodiversity Institute's most productive authors include Guy F. Midgley, John R. Wilson, J. Francisco Morales, David M. Richardson, Giselle Tamayo‐Castillo, Krystal A. Tolley, Carol Turley, Andreas Fischlin, Andrei Velichko and Mark P. Robertson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact