Kim E. Steiner

2.9k citations
58 papers · 2.3k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Kim E. Steiner

57 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Kim E. Steiner
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 646
  • Plant Science 1.4k
  • Insect Science 262
  • Ecological Modeling 42
Replace C. Eugene Jones with:
C. Eugene Jones United States
Andrew Lack United Kingdom
César A. Domínguez Mexico
Joel S. Shore Canada
Risa D. Sargent Canada
Masashi Ohara Japan
Elizabeth Elle Canada
Tamiji Inoue Japan
Pamela K. Diggle United States
Kuniyasu Momose Japan
Kim E. Steiner relative to C. Eugene Jones United States C. Eugene Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
C. Eugene Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim E. Steiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim E. Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim E. Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim E. Steiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim E. Steiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim E. Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim E. Steiner. The network helps show where Kim E. Steiner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Kim E. Steiner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim E. Steiner Line = papers co-authored together Kim E. Steiner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997305
2 1998238
3 1999160
4 1997131
5 1990108
6 199194
7 199491
8 200581
9
Specialized pollination systems in southern Africa : review article
200367
10 201567
11 199866
12 199065
13 200756
14 199849
15 198843
16 199642
17 201141
18 199540
19 199138
20 198532

About Kim E. Steiner

Kim E. Steiner is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Food Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (41 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (31 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (25 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (14 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (5 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (4 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (646 citations), Plant Science (1.4k citations), Insect Science (262 citations) and Ecological Modeling (42 citations). Kim E. Steiner has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include Steven D. Johnson, V. B. Whitehead, H. Peter Linder, Claude W. dePamphilis, Nelson D. Young, Roman Kaiser, Stefan Dötterl, Andrea D. Wolfe, Liang Liu and Christopher P. Randle. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Plant Systematics and Evolution, Evolution, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden and Systematic Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact