Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura

2.7k citations
330 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura

307 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Aquatic Science 522
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 695
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.2k
  • Ecology 1.1k
  • Oceanography 297
Replace Universidad del Mar with:
Universidad del Mar Mexico
Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Tabasco Mexico
El Colegio de Veracruz Mexico
University of Belize Belize
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C. Mexico
Center for Global Change and Sustainability Mexico
Instituto Tecnológico de Chetumal Mexico
U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center United States
Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal Mexico
Universidad de la Sierra Juárez Mexico
Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura relative to Universidad del Mar Mexico Universidad del Mar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Universidad del Mar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura at the time of their publication.

About Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura have published 330 papers, which have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 68 papers in Aquatic Science, 178 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 96 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 124 papers in Ecology and 39 papers in Oceanography on the topics of Marine and fisheries research (146 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (66 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (56 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (44 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (37 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (36 papers), Crustacean biology and ecology (35 papers) and Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (30 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aquatic Science (522 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (695 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations), Ecology (1.1k citations) and Oceanography (297 citations). Authors at Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura collaborate with scholars in Mexico, Brazil and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Fisheries Research, Journal of Fish Biology, Frontiers in Marine Science, Marine Policy and PeerJ. Some of Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura's most productive authors include Miguel Ángel Cisneros‐Mata, Maria Nazareth F. da Silva, James L. Patton, Armando T. Wakida-Kusunoki, Enrique Morales‐Bojórquez, Andrés M. Cisneros‐Montemayor, Javier Tovar‐Ávila, Omar Defeo, Manuel O. Nevárez-Martı́nez and Alvaro Hernández‐Flores.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact