National Institute of Anthropology and History

15.2k citations
3.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Institute of Anthropology and History

2.2k papers receiving 13.6k citations

Peers

National Institute of Anthropology and History
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
  • Paleontology 4.5k
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 1.9k
  • Archeology 392
  • Anthropology 2.9k
  • Archeology 2.6k
Replace Universidad de Londres with:
Universidad de Londres Mexico
Texas State University United States
Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo Mexico
Autonomous University of Yucatán Mexico
Universidad Veracruzana Mexico
Cultura Mexico
Autonomous University of Campeche Mexico
Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México Mexico
Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi United States
Centro de Investigación y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social Mexico
National Institute of Anthropology and History relative to Universidad de Londres Mexico Universidad de Londres's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Universidad de Londres · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Institute of Anthropology and History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Institute of Anthropology and History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Institute of Anthropology and History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Institute of Anthropology and History more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Institute of Anthropology and History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Institute of Anthropology and History at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Institute of Anthropology and History at the time of their publication.

About National Institute of Anthropology and History

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Institute of Anthropology and History have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 15.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 591 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts, 501 papers in Cultural Studies, 421 papers in Paleontology, 471 papers in Archeology and 439 papers in Anthropology on the topics of Latin American history and culture (551 papers), Mexican Socioeconomic and Environmental Dynamics (345 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (335 papers), Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education (216 papers), Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (190 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (163 papers), Archaeological and Geological Studies (161 papers) and Historical Studies in Latin America (151 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (4.5k citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (1.9k citations), Archeology (392 citations), Anthropology (2.9k citations) and Archeology (2.6k citations). Authors at National Institute of Anthropology and History collaborate with scholars in Mexico, United States and Argentina and have published in prestigious journals including Arqueología, Ancient Mesoamerica, Journal of Archaeological Science Reports, Latin American Antiquity and Estudios de Cultura Maya. Some of National Institute of Anthropology and History's most productive authors include Joaquín Arroyo‐Cabrales, María Eugenia Peña Reyes, Robert M. Malina, Miguel Bartolomé, Bertis B. Little, Leonardo López Luján, Saburo Sugiyama, Josefina Mansilla Lory, Lourdes Márquez Morfín and Swee Kheng Tan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact