Latin American Antiquity

1.1k papers and 16.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Latin American Antiquity in the last decades have received a total of 16.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Latin American Antiquity usually cover Paleontology (780 papers), Anthropology (421 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (353 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (767 papers), Latin American history and culture (352 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (278 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Latin American Antiquity are Wendy Ashmore, Tamara L. Bray, Michael D. Glascock, David L. Lentz, Paul Goldstein, Vernon L. Scarborough, John W. Janusek, Charles Stanish, Kazuo Aoyama and Háttula Moholy-Nagy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Latin American Antiquity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Latin American Antiquity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Latin American Antiquity.

Countries where authors publish in Latin American Antiquity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Latin American Antiquity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Latin American Antiquity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Latin American Antiquity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025