Ancient Mesoamerica

844 papers and 9.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 844 papers published in Ancient Mesoamerica in the last decades have received a total of 9.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Ancient Mesoamerica usually cover Paleontology (611 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (515 papers) and Anthropology (316 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (611 papers), Latin American history and culture (514 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (142 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ancient Mesoamerica are Takeshi Inomata, Barbara W. Leyden, William M. Ringle, Dan M. Healan, Heather McKillop, Payson Sheets, Arlen F. Chase, Diane Z. Chase, AnnCorinne Freter and Arthur A. Demarest.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ancient Mesoamerica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ancient Mesoamerica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ancient Mesoamerica.

Countries where authors publish in Ancient Mesoamerica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ancient Mesoamerica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ancient Mesoamerica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ancient Mesoamerica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025