Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Hepatology top 10%
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Papers in
- Genetics 212
- Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders 158
- Top scholars
- Marion LeboyerJulien CaldéraroArmand Mekontso DessapFrédéric RelaixPauline ChasteRomain Kroum GherardiWolf H. FridmanCatherine Sautès‐Fridman
- Journals
- Annals of Intensive Care (49 papers)Intensive Care Medicine (48 papers)PLoS ONE (47 papers)Critical Care (47 papers)Scientific Reports (42 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale
3.1k papers receiving 78.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 222
- Biological Psychiatry 601
- Hepatology 3.1k
- Genetics 2.9k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 9k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 5k
Countries citing scholars working at Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale at the time of their publication.
About Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale have published 3.4k papers, which have received a total of 78.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 33 papers in Biological Psychiatry, 212 papers in Genetics, 70 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 262 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 427 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine on the topics of Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (158 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (145 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (127 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (120 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (109 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (80 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (72 papers) and Blood groups and transfusion (65 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (601 citations), Hepatology (3.1k citations), Genetics (2.9k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (9k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (5k citations). Authors at Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale collaborate with scholars in France, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of Intensive Care, Intensive Care Medicine, PLoS ONE, Critical Care and Scientific Reports. Some of Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale's most productive authors include Marion Leboyer, Julien Caldéraro, Armand Mekontso Dessap, Frédéric Relaix, Pauline Chaste, Romain Kroum Gherardi, Wolf H. Fridman, Catherine Sautès‐Fridman, Florent Petitprez and Laurent Jean Brochard.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.