National Center for Supercomputing Applications
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Hardware and Architecture top 2%
- Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Papers in
-
- Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques 229
- Top scholars
- George CybenkoDavid M. CeperleyBruce HannonR.S. de GrootRobert V. O’NeillShahid NaeemMonica GrassoR. Raskin
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (110 papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (70 papers)Physical Review Letters (45 papers)Biophysical Journal (28 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysics (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaGermany
In The Last Decade
National Center for Supercomputing Applications
2.2k papers receiving 105.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 13.8k
- Hardware and Architecture 5.6k
- Global and Planetary Change 15.5k
- Instrumentation 2.3k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 5.6k
Countries citing scholars working at National Center for Supercomputing Applications
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Center for Supercomputing Applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Center for Supercomputing Applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Center for Supercomputing Applications more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Center for Supercomputing Applications
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the time of their publication.
About National Center for Supercomputing Applications
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Center for Supercomputing Applications have published 2.4k papers, which have received a total of 107.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 233 papers in Hardware and Architecture, 89 papers in Instrumentation, 406 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 169 papers in Information Systems and Management and 431 papers in Computer Networks and Communications on the topics of Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (242 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (229 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (185 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (160 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (159 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (134 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (128 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (111 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (13.8k citations), Hardware and Architecture (5.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (15.5k citations), Instrumentation (2.3k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (5.6k citations). Authors at National Center for Supercomputing Applications collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Physical Review Letters, Biophysical Journal and Astronomy and Astrophysics. Some of National Center for Supercomputing Applications's most productive authors include George Cybenko, David M. Ceperley, Bruce Hannon, R.S. de Groot, Robert V. O’Neill, Shahid Naeem, Monica Grasso, R. Raskin, Karin E. Limburg and Marjan van den Belt.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.