Intermountain Healthcare

157k citations
4.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Intermountain Healthcare

4.2k papers receiving 157k citations

Peers

Intermountain Healthcare
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
  • Cancer Research 10k
  • Health Information Management 6.4k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 8.7k
  • Internal Medicine 2k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 5.6k
Replace University of Utah Health Care with:
University of Utah Health Care United States
LDS Hospital United States
Children's Hospital Colorado United States
Denver Health Medical Center United States
Colorado School of Public Health United States
Intermountain Medical Center United States
The Lundquist Institute United States
Kaiser Permanente Northern California United States
Primary Children's Hospital United States
Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center United States
Intermountain Healthcare relative to University of Utah Health Care United States University of Utah Health Care's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.4×
University of Utah Health Care · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Intermountain Healthcare

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Intermountain Healthcare. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Intermountain Healthcare with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intermountain Healthcare more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Intermountain Healthcare

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Intermountain Healthcare at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Intermountain Healthcare at the time of their publication.

About Intermountain Healthcare

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Intermountain Healthcare have published 4.5k papers, which have received a total of 157k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 348 papers in Health Information Management, 82 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 190 papers in Emergency Medicine, 295 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 59 papers in Internal Medicine on the topics of Electronic Health Records Systems (241 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (103 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (88 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (82 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (79 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (67 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (62 papers) and Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (62 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cancer Research (10k citations), Health Information Management (6.4k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (8.7k citations), Internal Medicine (2k citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (5.6k citations). Authors at Intermountain Healthcare collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Perinatology, PEDIATRICS, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Some of Intermountain Healthcare's most productive authors include Robert D. Christensen, Julie M. Fritz, R. Scott Evans, Brent C. James, Erick Henry, David Ware Branch, Antonio C. Wolff, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Robert M. Silver and Lisa M. McShane.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact