Institute for Fiscal Studies
Impact in
- Economics and Econometrics top 1%
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Economic Growth and Productivity
- Firm Innovation and Growth
- Accounting top 1%
- Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Corporate Finance and Governance
Papers in
-
- Economic and Fiscal Studies 196
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 162
- Accounting 238
- Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis 155
- Corporate Taxation and Avoidance 58
- Top scholars
- Richard BlundellStephen R. BondFrank A. G. WindmeijerJohn Michael Van ReenenRachel GriffithCostas MeghirJames W. BanksOrazio Attanasio
- Journals
- Fiscal Studies (328 papers)The Economic Journal (93 papers)Journal of Public Economics (49 papers)Journal of Econometrics (45 papers)American Economic Review (33 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Institute for Fiscal Studies
1.6k papers receiving 97.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 213
- Economics and Econometrics 35.6k
- Accounting 12.7k
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8.1k
- Finance 6.6k
- Gender Studies 5.3k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Fiscal Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Fiscal Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Fiscal Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Fiscal Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Fiscal Studies
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Fiscal Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Fiscal Studies at the time of their publication.
About Institute for Fiscal Studies
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Fiscal Studies have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 97.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 681 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 238 papers in Accounting, 134 papers in Gender Studies, 80 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 93 papers in Statistics and Probability on the topics of Economic and Fiscal Studies (196 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (162 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (155 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (132 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (131 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (69 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (58 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (56 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Economics and Econometrics (35.6k citations), Accounting (12.7k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (8.1k citations), Finance (6.6k citations) and Gender Studies (5.3k citations). Authors at Institute for Fiscal Studies collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Fiscal Studies, The Economic Journal, Journal of Public Economics, Journal of Econometrics and American Economic Review. Some of Institute for Fiscal Studies's most productive authors include Richard Blundell, Stephen R. Bond, Frank A. G. Windmeijer, John Michael Van Reenen, Rachel Griffith, Costas Meghir, James W. Banks, Orazio Attanasio, Barbara Sianesi and Michael Devereux.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.