Vienna Institute of Demography
Impact in
- Demography top 1%
- Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Papers in
- Demography 412
- Family Dynamics and Relationships 233
- Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management 162
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 41
- Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences 39
- Top scholars
- Tomáš SobotkaWolfgang LutzSergei ScherbovWarren C. SandersonAlexia PrskawetzDimiter PhilipovRaya MuttarakIsabella Buber‐Ennser
- Journals
- Demographic Research (58 papers)European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie (31 papers)Population and Development Review (16 papers)PLoS ONE (15 papers)International Journal of Cardiology (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustriaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Vienna Institute of Demography
794 papers receiving 26k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
- Demography 10k
- Gender Studies 2.7k
- Sociology and Political Science 5k
- Economics and Econometrics 2.5k
- Reproductive Medicine 849
Countries citing scholars working at Vienna Institute of Demography
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Vienna Institute of Demography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Vienna Institute of Demography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vienna Institute of Demography more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Vienna Institute of Demography
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Vienna Institute of Demography at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Vienna Institute of Demography at the time of their publication.
About Vienna Institute of Demography
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Vienna Institute of Demography have published 848 papers, which have received a total of 26k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 412 papers in Demography, 79 papers in Gender Studies, 125 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 37 papers in Health and 178 papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of Family Dynamics and Relationships (233 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (162 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (60 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (41 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (39 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (37 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (30 papers) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Demography (10k citations), Gender Studies (2.7k citations), Sociology and Political Science (5k citations), Economics and Econometrics (2.5k citations) and Reproductive Medicine (849 citations). Authors at Vienna Institute of Demography collaborate with scholars in Austria, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Demographic Research, European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie, Population and Development Review, PLoS ONE and International Journal of Cardiology. Some of Vienna Institute of Demography's most productive authors include Tomáš Sobotka, Wolfgang Lutz, Sergei Scherbov, Warren C. Sanderson, Alexia Prskawetz, Dimiter Philipov, Raya Muttarak, Isabella Buber‐Ennser, Roman Hoffmann and Éva Beaujouan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.