Centre for Social Sciences
Impact in
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
-
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Political Theory and Democracy
Papers in
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 78
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements 75
- Political Theory and Democracy 50
- Minority Rights and Languages 34
- European Union Policy and Governance 27
-
- Social Media and Politics 33
- Top scholars
- Márton BeneMelanie SmithKároly TakácsAnya DiekmannGergő Medve‐BálintGábor HajduJudit TakácsZsófia Papp
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (15 papers)Scientific Reports (14 papers)Politics and Governance (14 papers)Social Networks (12 papers)East European Politics and Societies and Cultures (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- HungaryAustriaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Centre for Social Sciences
886 papers receiving 10.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
- Communication 704
- Political Science and International Relations 2.1k
- Sociology and Political Science 2.9k
- Health 337
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 363
Countries citing scholars working at Centre for Social Sciences
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre for Social Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre for Social Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre for Social Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centre for Social Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre for Social Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre for Social Sciences at the time of their publication.
About Centre for Social Sciences
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre for Social Sciences have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 357 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 57 papers in Communication, 312 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 19 papers in General Social Sciences and 69 papers in Law on the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (78 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (75 papers), Political Theory and Democracy (50 papers), Romani and Gypsy Studies (42 papers), Minority Rights and Languages (34 papers), Social Media and Politics (33 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (28 papers) and European Union Policy and Governance (27 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Communication (704 citations), Political Science and International Relations (2.1k citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.9k citations), Health (337 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (363 citations). Authors at Centre for Social Sciences collaborate with scholars in Hungary, Austria and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Politics and Governance, Social Networks and East European Politics and Societies and Cultures. Some of Centre for Social Sciences's most productive authors include Márton Bene, Melanie Smith, Károly Takács, Anya Diekmann, Gergő Medve‐Bálint, Gábor Hajdu, Judit Takács, Zsófia Papp, Zsolt Boda and Júlia Koltai.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.