Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Papers in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders 25
-
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation 24
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 18
- Top scholars
- Kathy RowanDavid A HarrisonDuncan YoungSheila HarveyTony BradyMervyn SingerCaroline GoldfradCatherine Welch
- Journals
- Critical Care (53 papers)Intensive Care Medicine (26 papers)Critical Care Medicine (21 papers)Journal of the Intensive Care Society (20 papers)BMJ Open (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre
268 papers receiving 13.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 2.5k
- Emergency Medicine 2.7k
- Emergency Medical Services 1.5k
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 851
- Epidemiology 4.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre at the time of their publication.
About Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre have published 380 papers, which have received a total of 20.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 43 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 45 papers in Emergency Medicine, 98 papers in Epidemiology, 11 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 11 papers in Nephrology on the topics of Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (94 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (25 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (24 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (20 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (19 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (19 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (18 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (2.5k citations), Emergency Medicine (2.7k citations), Emergency Medical Services (1.5k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (851 citations) and Epidemiology (4.8k citations). Authors at Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Critical Care, Intensive Care Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, Journal of the Intensive Care Society and BMJ Open. Some of Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre's most productive authors include Kathy Rowan, David A Harrison, Duncan Young, Sheila Harvey, Tony Brady, Mervyn Singer, Caroline Goldfrad, Catherine Welch, Hannah Wunsch and Manu Shankar‐Hari.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.