Royal College of Anaesthetists
Impact in
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
-
- Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Papers in
-
- Airway Management and Intubation Techniques 27
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents 20
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 73
- Top scholars
- Ramani MoonesingheMichael P. W. GrocottTim CookEleanor WalkerCecilia Vindrola‐PadrosCharles Matthew OliverD. J. N. WongMonty Mythen
- Journals
- Anaesthesia (57 papers)British Journal of Anaesthesia (31 papers)Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (12 papers)BMJ Open (10 papers)Anesthesiology (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Royal College of Anaesthetists
179 papers receiving 4.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 878
- Developmental Neuroscience 304
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 295
- Immunology and Allergy 374
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Royal College of Anaesthetists
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal College of Anaesthetists. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal College of Anaesthetists with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal College of Anaesthetists more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Royal College of Anaesthetists
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal College of Anaesthetists at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal College of Anaesthetists at the time of their publication.
About Royal College of Anaesthetists
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal College of Anaesthetists have published 238 papers, which have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 39 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 78 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 9 papers in Developmental Neuroscience, 18 papers in Emergency Medicine and 12 papers in Emergency Medical Services on the topics of Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (73 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (27 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (20 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (14 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (13 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (10 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (9 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (9 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (878 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (304 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (295 citations), Immunology and Allergy (374 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.2k citations). Authors at Royal College of Anaesthetists collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Anaesthesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, BMJ Open and Anesthesiology. Some of Royal College of Anaesthetists's most productive authors include Ramani Moonesinghe, Michael P. W. Grocott, Tim Cook, Eleanor Walker, Cecilia Vindrola‐Padros, Charles Matthew Oliver, D. J. N. Wong, Monty Mythen, Steve Harris and L. Strunin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.