Instituto Cajal

172.8k citations
3.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Instituto Cajal

3.2k papers receiving 172.6k citations

Peers

Instituto Cajal
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
  • Developmental Neuroscience 12.8k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 40.9k
  • Neurology 13.6k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 2.8k
  • Biological Psychiatry 1.1k
Replace Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases with:
Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases Spain
Centro de Neurociências e Biologia Celular Portugal
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa Spain
Instituto de Neurociencias Spain
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Barcelona Spain
Centro de Investigacion Principe Felipe Spain
Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle France
Institut du Cerveau France
Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada Spain
Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular
Instituto Cajal relative to Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases Spain Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Instituto Cajal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituto Cajal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituto Cajal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituto Cajal more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Instituto Cajal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituto Cajal at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituto Cajal at the time of their publication.

About Instituto Cajal

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituto Cajal have published 3.2k papers, which have received a total of 172.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 304 papers in Developmental Neuroscience, 997 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 263 papers in Neurology, 59 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience and 279 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience on the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (566 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (304 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (198 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (167 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (156 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (144 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (120 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (109 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Neuroscience (12.8k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (40.9k citations), Neurology (13.6k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (2.8k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (1.1k citations). Authors at Instituto Cajal collaborate with scholars in Spain, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience, Brain Research, Glia and European Journal of Neuroscience. Some of Instituto Cajal's most productive authors include Luis Miguel García‐Segura, Javier DeFelipe, Ignacio Torres‐Alemán, Maria Angela Nieto, Alfonso Araque, F. Valverde, Íñigo Azcoitia, Gertrudis Perea, Carmen Guaza and Juan Lerma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact